Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

Send us an enquiry
Close

Must someone with a beneficial interest in an estate be served with notice of an application for a Statutory Will which would result in them being disinherited if executed?

07 July 2016

Yes, says the Court of Protection in the case of Re D.

Although, guidance is given about when dispensing with service on interested parties may be acceptable.

Background
This case was an appeal against an order which allowed the applicant to dispense with the usual requirement to serve papers, relating to a Statutory Will application, on someone with a material interest in the estate, who is the father of the patient. The father was currently entitled to half the estate on intestacy. He had been estranged from his son and his whereabouts were unknown at the time the application was made. If the proposed Statutory Will was executed then he would have been disinherited.

The appeal was allowed.

Decision
Senior Judge Lush concluded that, in this particular case, where the party affected by the Statutory Will would be materially affected, and there were no compelling reasons to dispense with the requirement of serving the papers, then they should comply with the obligation. The case may have been decided differently if it was an urgent case however, the patient could live for another 45 years or more. In addition, he ruled that more efforts should have been made to locate the father in the first instance.

Finally, Senior Judge Lush commented on the Official Solicitor’s request that the mother, who brought the original application, pay for her own costs. In light of the fact that the application had been successful on two counts, he concluded that it would be unfair to depart from the general rule that proceedings concerning a patient’s affairs be borne by them. He also warned that this might not always be the case and that the Official Solicitor could, in the future, seek a costs order against such applicants.

Case report: D, Re [2016] EWCOP 35 (01 July 2016)

 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
Isabel McIver View Biography

Isabel McIver

Managing Associate
Sheffield

15 Apr 2025
Michael Crowther Headshot

Employment Rights Bill: Update Following House of Commons Approval on 12 March 2025

Employment Rights Bill amendments approved by House of Commons on 12 March 2025. Key changes and implications since February update outlined.

09 Apr 2025
Peter Parker Headshot

Demystifying contractual terms for charities: Limitation and exclusion of liability

Exploring the limitation and exclusion of liability in charity contracts.

07 Apr 2025
Hayley Marsden Headshot

A Civil Society Covenant – here we go again?

Reflections from our recent Charity Leadership Forums.